European Debt Crisis 101

Hi there

I received this summary from Craig James at Commsec Research and thought it was great to help everyone understand this new world. Please enjoy. 

Heres the necessary disclaimer! The attached report has been prepared without taking account of the objectives, financial situation or needs of any particular individual. For this reason, any individual should, before acting on the information in this report, consider the appropriateness of the information, having regard to the individual’s objectives, financial situation and needs and, if necessary, seek appropriate professional advice.  

European Debt Crisis 101 -Economic & financial market issues

The on-going saga that is the European debt crisis has sent investors heads spinning. With all the focus on debts and deficits, many investors rightly want to know what that has to do with us in Australia. And then there is the attention devoted to bond yields – hardly mainstream for most investors.

  • There are no easy answers to the issues facing European countries. Simply they need to get their financial houses in order. And governments must convince investors, rating agencies and institutions like the International Monetary Fund and European Central Bank that they are taking the necessary measures to stabilise, and ultimately address the problems they face.
  • This article seeks to outline the key issues as simply as we can while also presenting the basics of bond yields.

The big picture

The countries that sparked the European debt crisis (EDC) are not the biggest in the world. Greece is ranked the 34th largest economy with Portugal the 43rd largest and Ireland ranked 45th. But the stakes have been raised with the focus on the world’s 8th largest country – Italy –together with Spain, ranked 12th.

  • Still it is important to note that China and India together are bigger than the entire Euro area in size – actually they overtook the region three years ago. And China & India together are now bigger than the US and are about the same size as the European Union (in purchasing power parity terms).
  • In terms of contribution to world economic growth, China is the most important followed by the US and India. And Hong Kong, Singapore, Taiwan and South Korea together will make a bigger contribution to world economic growth this year than Germany.
  • So why the fuss about Europe? Fundamentally it is all about contagion. If Greece can’t repay its debts then this would affect European banks and the shockwaves would be felt across the globe. But it is worth pointing out the respective size of the countries involved and their importance to global economic growth. Fundamentally the world would be in bigger trouble if China or India were to get into difficulties.

 The European Debt Crisis

 It wasn’t that long ago when the only thing mentioned in the financial news was the GFC – or global financial crisis. (Actually, as an aside, that period should be better described as the North Atlantic financial crisis because it started in the US and spread to the UK and Western Europe, with other countries less affected.)

  • But now there is a new crisis dominating the airwaves and the epicentre is clearly in Europe.
  • The GFC began when highly indebted home loan borrowers in the US ran into repayment difficulties when interest rates rose. More and more customers found that they couldn’t keep up with repayments, causing bad loans to rise at banks. The fall-out spread to those who invested in the housing market in various forms, in turn causing banks to become very wary of dealing with other banks. 

A sneeze turns into pneumonia? 

  • Just like a cold or flu, the financial jitters were highly contagious, affecting economies more broadly and dragging down sharemarkets across the globe.
  • The European debt crisis is effectively a by-product of the GFC. During the GFC, countries tried to keep their economies growing by cutting taxes or spending more money. That wasn’t a problem for countries with low debt levels like Australia. But it has certainly posed challenges for countries that started out with high budget deficits and debt levels.
  • Investors have become more and more concerned that governments of countries like Greece, Portugal and Ireland might not be able to meet their debt repayments. As a result demand for these countries’ government bonds have fallen, boosting borrowing costs (bond yields).
  • European economies have attempted to help out their highly indebted neighbours by offering funds, but in return they have required these governments to meet certain conditions in getting their spending more in line with their revenue.
  • Governments have responded by trying to cut their spending or increase taxes, but understandably the people in the affected countries haven’t been overly supportive – to say the least.
  • The worry is that countries could fail – effectively go broke – because they can’t keep up with debt repayments. Others worry that countries like Greece will abandon the euro and return to the drachma.
  • Just like the GFC, one of the biggest concerns is contagion. That is, a country like Greece doesn’t pay its debts, causing its bankers to withdraw funds from other banks with the effect spreading through Europe and the world more generally.

Let’s stick together 

  • Publicly, all European governments are committed to Europe staying together. But clearly the problems are significant and there are various ways the situation may be resolved, none of them overly palatable.
  • At the end of the day countries need to show discipline in cutting some forms of spending, while at the same time focussing on ways to grow their economies – say, through building new roads, bridges, schools or hospitals.
  • As any business knows, you need to keep the money coming in while at the same time controlling how much you spend. Austerity measures – where governments drastically cut spending in a short period of time– don’t work without other measures to increase the money going to the government. Otherwise you just dig a bigger and bigger hole.

 Investors need to be vigilant

 For investors these are clearly volatile times. If governments do the right thing and work through their problems, then confidence will return and sharemarkets will recover. But the longer that the problems continue and debt costs rise, then people will speculate about worst-case scenarios.

  • It is important to remember that countries like Greece and Portugal are quite small – although Italy is a far different proposition – the eighth largest economy in the world. However, whether big or small, investors around the world want countries to meet their obligations.
  • As we found out through the GFC, no matter how dark were the days, solutions were developed. What we don’t know at present is what form those solutions will take and how long the recovery process will be. But clearly those sharemarket investors that took a longer-term view and bought in the dark days of the GFC have been rewarded.
  • Aussie investors also shouldn’t lose focus on the big picture. China continues to buy our iron ore, coal and other metals. Provided China continues to grow, so will the global economy and so will our economy here in Australia.
  • As we found through the GFC if Europe or the US fell into recession again, China would cut interest rates and lift spending in order to keep its economy growing. And here in Australia the Reserve Bank would similarly cut interest rates to boost spending and building.
  • For every risk, there is an opportunity and the current environment is no different.

 What is all the fuss about bond yields?

 One of the by-products of the European Debt Crisis is that there has never been so much written on government bonds. In the past the subject barely got a mention – being confined to a relatively small section of the financial markets or in university courses on finance. Now it seems that everyone is an expert on Italian bond yields.

  • So what is a government bond? Well when governments spend more than they take in in taxes, they need to meet the shortfall. There are only so many things you can sell to raise the necessary funds, so the main way of meeting the shortfall is by borrowing.
  • Similar to a company issuing shares to raise funds, governments issue bonds. The government hopes to entice investors by promising to pay back the funds in full at the end of the term or investment period. And in return for the use of the funds, governments offer an attractive return (coupon).
  • The interest rate or yield may be lower than you could get, say, on a term deposit, but the added attraction is that government bonds were considered the safest of investments. Companies or banks may fail, but on a government bond, you’ll always get your money back in full – or so it was generally believed.
  • Government bonds trade like shares on financial markets. And the usual principle applies – demand and supply. If demand for the bonds fall or supply rises, the price of the bonds fall. On bond markets, the actual yield or interest rate moves inversely to the price.

 Not all countries are the same

 So if investors become worried that a certain government – say, Greece – may be more of a risk than a bond of another government – say, Germany – they may buy less Greek bonds and more German bonds. The Greek bonds may fall in price, pushing up the interest rate or yield.

  • If for instance Greece now has to pay a return of 7 per cent on its bonds, rather than 5 per cent, then it will need to pay out more to its investors. In other words it pays the price for being in worse financial shape – bigger budget deficits and higher debts – than other countries.

 The bad news doesn’t stop there

 So a country may be in worse financial shape and it pays the price by having to pay out more to investors on its debt, or bonds. The problem is that this can make already poor finances even worse.

  • When government bond yields hit 7 per cent in Greece, Portugal and Ireland, the countries fretted that they wouldn’t be able to find the money to pay investors as well as other obligations like old age pensions and salaries to public servants. As a result they sought “loans” or “bail-outs” from other European economies and the International Monetary Fund.
  • Now the yields on Italian bonds have hit 7 per cent and investors are again worrying. Italy has around €350 billion of bonds that are reaching the end of their terms or maturities next year and they may have to pay roughly three times the interest rate that they paid last time round. Clearly that has the potential to cripple the country.

 The solution

 The solution is quite simple. Investors need to have confidence that the Government is good for the money – that they will be able to pay back investors when the bond matures. If that is the case then demand for bonds rise, and if the supply of bonds doesn’t change then the price of the bonds goes up, and thus the interest rate or yield comes down.

  • Alternatively, the Government needs to find investors that are willing to buy its bonds – a white knight if you like, like the European Central Bank. If the yield on the bonds is kept low, then this takes pressure off the government to meet the interest bill as well as its other bills.

 So what does it mean for us ‘down under?’

 If investors are worried whether they will get their money back on government bonds, then we could end up with a re-run of the global financial crisis (GFC) when banks didn’t want to lend to other banks. As a result the cost of borrowing goes up. And as we saw in the GFC, if banks have to pay more for their money, we have to pay more as well – that is, it tends to get passed on to home loan and business borrowers.

  • And as we also saw in the GFC if banks aren’t lending and money is harder to get, investors get worried that less borrowing will lead to less spending and therefore slower growing economies. As a result, sharemarkets fall on fears about weaker economies as well as investor jitters.
  • Clearly, it’s in everyone’s interests for the highly indebted countries of the world – especially Europe – to make attempts to reduce their debts to manageable levels and thus gain the confidence of investors. 
Posted on by Louise Gooden | Leave a comment

The November edition of The Savvy Investor is now published

Hi all

This month we have a look at how the Greek crisis is now affecting Italy, and why fixed rates are falling. We also examine how we can transfer our investment property into a Self Managed Super Fund (SMSF).  

Download it now at http://www.halogen.com.au/savvy/savvynewsletter.html

Wishing you health and prosperity!

Posted on by Louise Gooden | Comments Off

The October edition of The Savvy Investor is now published

Hi all

This month we look at buying shares cheaply, revisit dollar cost averaging, have a very informative article on why Trauma Insurance is so important in any investor’s portfolio plus a lot more on tax and estate planning advice

Download it now at http://www.halogen.com.au/savvy/savvynewsletter.html

Wishing you health and prosperity!

Posted on by Venn Williams | Comments Off

The best performing shares over the past 20 years

  • I really loved this summary of the situation re shares provided by Comsec research this morning. Their summary of the big picture is concise and helpful in difficult times.

Here is their comments

In these current uncertain times, investors are opting to leave more of their funds in cash rather than shares. However the fact remains that shares have out-performed all asset classes over the past 20 years. Since October 1991 total returns on Aussie shares have grown by 433 per cent or 22 per cent per annum. Using data supplied by CBA Quant, CommSec have identified the best performing major stocks over the past 20 years. Head and shoulders above the rest of the pack has been Fortescue Metals Group with returns up a phenomenal 248,624 per cent over the past 20 years, or 12,431 per cent per annum. Clearly Fortescue is an outlier. But of the current S&P/ASX50 companies, 28 have been listed consistently for the past 20 years. And none of the 28 companies have produced negative returns over the period. Forty-two of the current S&P/ASX50 companies have been consistently listed for the past decade and only 10 of the companies have produced negative total returns over the period. While investors are currently favouring cash, it’s worth noting that If $100,000 had been invested in stocks at the end of 1990, it would have been worth $804,000 at the start of this year. The same $100,000 would have appreciated to just under $305,000.

 The big picture

  • Investors are justifiably cautious in the current times. First there was the Global Financial Crisis (GFC) with banks and companies failing, dragging advanced economies into recession. In 2010 fiscal-driven economic recoveries were engineered, but since, European countries have struggled to finance high debts and deficits. As a result economies are faltering as they employ austerity measures, causing business and consumer confidence to dry up.
  • Sharemarkets slumped over 2008, recovered over 2009, consolidated in 2010 and then weakened again over 2011. The response by investors has been to hold more of their funds in cash and bank deposits. In fact according to respondents in the latest consumer sentiment survey conducted by Westpac and the Melbourne Institute, the wisest place for savings was banks, in fact the reading on banks was the highest in 37 years.
  • And while the preference for cash and deposits is understandable, it ignores the fact that shares have out-performed other financial assets over the long-term. The desire for capital preservation may dominate at present, but at some point longer-term investors will have to stand back and look at the big picture.
  • The All Ordinaries Accumulation index records total returns on shares That is, it measures the capital appreciation on shares or the change in the share price together with dividends paid). Over the past 20 years the All Ords Accumulation index has risen by over 433 per cent or around 22 per cent a year. The S&P/ASX 50 total return was 453 per cent or 23 per cent per year.
  • If $100,000 had been invested at the end of 1990, it would have been worth $804,000 at the start of this year. If the same $100,000 had been left in cash, it would now be worth just under $305,000.
  • The rise in consumer prices over the past 20 years (inflation) was 68.2 per cent while prices rose 33.3 per cent over the past decade.
  • Clearly investors need to apply different strategies at different times. A defensive or safety-first approach reigns currently. But when the fear recedes, investors in their 20s, 30s and early 40s need to refocus on what they want their portfolios to look like in 20 years from now.
Posted on by Louise Gooden | Comments Off

Is your future worth as much attention as a trip to Europe?

I dont know about you but alot of my friends are using the opportunity of the strong Aussie dollar to travel. One couple friend in particular, was excited about their forthcoming three week trip to Europe.  They explained the discounts they’d received by booking online, consulting discount travel websites and doing their homework.  As they enthusiastically described their meticulous planning, I couldn’t help being struck by a paradox: only months before, this same couple had told me how little interest they had in financial matters.  They joked about their numerous super funds of which they knew nothing about, their unpaid bills and lack of budgeting (except for this holiday). ’Money’ was too difficult to talk about or organise.

For most of us, the short-term gratification of overseas holidays will always be more compelling than longer-term planning for a future we may find hard to imagine.  But, to use that old management cliché, those who fail to plan really do plan to fail. And we gte older quicker than you think!

If my European-bound friends had applied the same casual disregard to their holiday, just showing up at the airport hoping to get a flight somewhere, not knowing what visas they required, and with no accommodation booked, it’s easy to imagine what a disaster would have awaited them at the other end of their long haul flight.

Preparing our long term financial futures has several elements in common with planning a trip away.    What sort of lifestyle experience do we want to enjoy at the end of our long haul career?  How can we ensure our money gets us the best possible deal?  Are we protected if something goes wrong?

If I have a wish for all my readers it is simply this: if you haven’t already done so, please start giving thought to your long term financial future.  Sometime, during the end of year lull, clear out that ‘money’ drawer, start getting organised and consult an expert.  Like most of the tasks we put off, you’ll probably find it’s far less difficult once you get round to it.  You may even find it curiously satisfying to get your financial life in order.

Posted on by Louise Gooden | 6 Comments
Page 1 of 212